[3]21:08 Cradle[-TL-]: They should make something like 5 minute botcheck option.
so Cradle can afk Beset ^^
Cradle
[-TL-]
I fully agree with jove!
Ner0
[~FoS~]
here here I concur!
Shinji_Ikari
[Cloud]
har, har, Brogs!
Brom
[Choob]
Why not?
Sinistar
[Pond]
Would be nice to afk places like that at shorter intervals.
Its a yes from me.
Shinji_Ikari
[Cloud]
See the first post in this thread.
Mr Tiddles
[CFH]
phone options have this with going screen turn off in 5 minutes options
Onslaught
[(WAR)]
I actually suggested something like that in clan chat a few weeks back, I think it is a good idea.
Hxde
[]
Yes!
Wicky
[C.]
No
Swooshy
[TAG]
yes! considering my experience in dieing from afking spots I shouldn't I'd love this
C4LV1N
[SWC]
Why can't he just do fight one more?
Liah
[CLEAN]
Why not? Make it a donators option like the 20 mins botcheck. Some people want more time between checks, others less. Those wanted longer times between botchecks got their way with the donators option, so I'm all for doing the same for those who want less time between botchecks.
Jeffreyj
[Pond]
No. Those that afk have to be punished. Giving them an option for easymode gets a thumbs down from me.
Darkness
[Corps]
No.
Vilma
[Weird]
Oh yea. Could afk somewhere else. ;)
Isaac
[AdC]
This would be a no from me, makes afk combat a lot easier just paying money, which is pay to win definitely.
Also it could break the game in the sense of adding crowding to locations because now people can afk it a lot easier at lower levels.
Felix
Pendragon
[*TF*]
I really don't see why not. Go for it.
At the same time, I'd love a, "force botcheck" option for efficiency when afking.
Kitty
[CFH]
Several valid reasons have already been pointed out as to why this wouldn't be a good option...but then again, I'm not sure if this was even a serious question.
Ignis Vi
[~one~]
+1 Felix
The Shiv
[Corps]
wouldn't it just be faster for people to pop their head every five minutes to eat? you're presumably fighting afk for the five minutes and doing a botcheck, so why not just pop in every five minutes?
Marley
[World]
I think this is silly and see no reason for it personally.
However, I do like Pendragon's idea about a forced botcheck.
Truant
[~FoS~]
I think I would prefer a 7 or 8 minute bc.
Raj
[Corps]
Fight one more is a better option but 5 min bot check is stupid and sounds like a joke
Edited on 27-02-2018 05:38
aussiebeast
[Corps]
If you can't fight safely at a location, then move ;)
And watch that dreaded FIGHT ALL happening
Twitxhy
[*TF*]
This is one of those things I wanna oppose because I feel like if you're gonna afk combat you should have to be able to survive a full botcheck. However since people can already achieve this with smartphone screen lock timers, we would really just be evening the playing field.
barun511
[*TF*]
Twitch is like the anti brogs
Gaz
[Zen]
id much prefer have the option to change the fight one more to a set amount like fight 5 more ete, this could be a donation option?
oliver_queen
[Cloud]
no afk is dangerous no matter who does it just get more complaining there is more deaths (SLM - Syrnia Lives Matter)
ExcessBadger
[*TF*]
Yes afk combat is the only way I can enjoy combat and this would be great for fighting at higher level spots.
Which I can see the issue non AFK players have but... click fighting still gets better exp and better drops in the same time frame so it doesn't impact things much.
At home I have at times set a timer for afking at places I can't fully afk so I can already do something like this, but just having it built in would be ideal and help others that play somewhere they can't set timers.
Durins_Bane
[Moria]
No.
JFizzle
[~DoS~]
I think we'd see more deaths and also less combat xp from those who use it... let's make this happen!!
Edwin
[CLEAN]
No
They should fix the broken premium event order first before creating other premium option
Divinity
[~ADV~]
Yes.
LCA
[~ADV~]
100% no
smitts
[~ADV~]
No
That makes afk combat so ridiculously easy
fraggelmupp
[TLO]
no
Nuthouse
[-DRS-]
No
We use cookies to enhance your experience on our website. By continuing to browse, you agree to our use of cookies as described in our Privacy Policy.