Syrnia the free online RPG game
Home
Game Tour
News
Forum
Manual
Highscore


Forum -> Feedback -> 5 mins botcheck option

Only users can reply.


Pages: 1- 2

JoveS
[-TL-]
19-02-2017 21:10


[3]21:08 Cradle[-TL-]: They should make something like 5 minute botcheck option.

so Cradle can afk Beset ^^
jove97 struck and dealt 58 damage to the Platina flame dragon. jove97 struck and dealt 50 damage to the Syriet flame dragon. jove97 struck and dealt 49 damage to the Obsidian flame dragon.
Mr. Addy
Keeping this game free by adding ads to every topic
Cradle
[-TL-]
19-02-2017 21:11



I fully agree with jove!
"Thank God I'm an atheist"

You are attacking a Roodarus (211) at Crab nest.

[1]02:44 Rami[-=D=-]: cradle is like the swine flu.. he is everywhere

[1]02:43 Rictor[~X~]: love ya Cradle XD
EdgeShot
[~FoS~]
19-02-2017 21:49



here here I concur!
Two roads diverged in the wood and I, I took the one less travelled by, and that has made all the difference.

www.TLGrounds.com, the #1 resource for Syrnia information
Shinji_Ikari
[Cloud]
19-02-2017 22:50



har, har, Brogs!
~Cloud Nine Forever,Forever Cloud Nine ~

When in doubt, choke em out!

Critical hit: You struck and dealt 77 damage to the Undead priest.

The Obsidian flame dragon struck at Shinji_Ikari and did 1 damage.
Brom
[Choob]
19-02-2017 23:09


Why not?
Avaricious
[Pond]
20-02-2017 00:05



Would be nice to afk places like that at shorter intervals.

Its a yes from me.
[3]21:50 Lamb[Pond]: Cloud has spoken. All discussions must cease.

[3]21:49 Jeffreyj[Pond]: To discuss more of your problems Pond desires a 50 dollar fee.
Shinji_Ikari
[Cloud]
20-02-2017 00:05



See the first post in this thread.
~Cloud Nine Forever,Forever Cloud Nine ~

When in doubt, choke em out!

Critical hit: You struck and dealt 77 damage to the Undead priest.

The Obsidian flame dragon struck at Shinji_Ikari and did 1 damage.
Mr Tiddles
[CFH]
20-02-2017 00:07



phone options have this with going screen turn off in 5 minutes options
You and 5 players are attacking a Roodarus (211) at Castle Rose.
Hxde
20-02-2017 05:05



Yes!
“What can be asserted without proof can be dismissed without proof.”
-Christopher Hitchens
Dash
[C.]
20-02-2017 09:15



No
[2]08:40 (Mod)Moderator: Borneo muted *05/25/16*
A Swoosh
[TAG]
20-02-2017 23:25



yes! considering my experience in dieing from afking spots I shouldn't I'd love this
2015-05-17 23:28:03 Swoosh killed ShapeShifter

[2]19:59 barun511[*TF*]: You don't kill TAG miners, TAG miners kill you
C4LV1N
[SWC]
21-02-2017 02:05


Why can't he just do fight one more?
Liah
[CLEAN]
09-03-2017 11:37



Why not? Make it a donators option like the 20 mins botcheck. Some people want more time between checks, others less. Those wanted longer times between botchecks got their way with the donators option, so I'm all for doing the same for those who want less time between botchecks.
We can only be who we are, no more, no less
Jeffreyj
[Pond]
09-03-2017 15:47



No. Those that afk have to be punished. Giving them an option for easymode gets a thumbs down from me.
You have gained clanleadership of the Smexyness clan. Cloud has stopped as clanleader, you took over her place. <3

Joined: July 01, 2005 - 18:59
2014-01-04 22:39:22 Jeffreyj killed lestro
Darkness
[Corps]
09-03-2017 16:49



No.
~ Proud Member Of Semper Fi.
Vilma
[Weird]
09-03-2017 18:08



Oh yea. Could afk somewhere else. ;)
Whisky for my men, beer for my horses ;)
Isaac
[AdC]
25-02-2018 19:51



This would be a no from me, makes afk combat a lot easier just paying money, which is pay to win definitely.

Also it could break the game in the sense of adding crowding to locations because now people can afk it a lot easier at lower levels.


Felix
Pendragon
[*TF*]
25-02-2018 23:27



I really don't see why not. Go for it.

At the same time, I'd love a, "force botcheck" option for efficiency when afking.
- youtube.com/pendragontheninja

John 15:13
Greater love hath no man than this, that a man lay down his life for his friends.
Synth
[CFH]
26-02-2018 05:19



Several valid reasons have already been pointed out as to why this wouldn't be a good option...but then again, I'm not sure if this was even a serious question.
I love you so much, da. I know that you are resting in peace now, without pain. Thank you for being my mentor, my best friend, and my hero.

10/30/1954 - 2/25/2018
Ignis Mundi
[~one~]
26-02-2018 07:26



+1 Felix
<3 You have married Foxy! <3
The Shiv
[Corps]
26-02-2018 20:17


wouldn't it just be faster for people to pop their head every five minutes to eat? you're presumably fighting afk for the five minutes and doing a botcheck, so why not just pop in every five minutes?
Marley
[World]
26-02-2018 20:55



I think this is silly and see no reason for it personally.

However, I do like Pendragon's idea about a forced botcheck.
~ Today is all anyone has .. tomorrow is not a guarantee ~

Forum -> Clans -> New [World] Adventure!

You have married Foozard!
Truant
[~FoS~]
26-02-2018 22:57



I think I would prefer a 7 or 8 minute bc.
[1] 04:47 spidey101[D2A]: chris doesnt like me.

"What's up dog, I killed you." - Kenny Powers MFCEO

0/61 The Captain Keelhail struck at Truant and did 69 damage.
Raj
[Corps]
27-02-2018 05:38


Fight one more is a better option but 5 min bot check is stupid and sounds like a joke

Edited on 27-02-2018 05:38
Twitxhy
[*TF*]
27-02-2018 09:13



This is one of those things I wanna oppose because I feel like if you're gonna afk combat you should have to be able to survive a full botcheck. However since people can already achieve this with smartphone screen lock timers, we would really just be evening the playing field.
[2]02:15 (Mod)Moderator: Twitchiwhatchamicallit!

piranhattack has declined Cooked Piranha for you at Kinam

Smithing level: 98 (9999999 exp, 1 for next level)
Pages: 1- 2

Only users can reply.


Forum -> Feedback -> 5 mins botcheck option

Syrnia © 2018 Mobile version